<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Jaquette in Ohio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://billjaquette.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://billjaquette.net</link>
	<description>Technology, Politics, Humor, etc.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Ohio 2008 State-wide Issues. by CaseyM</title>
		<link>http://billjaquette.net/2008/10/27/ohio-2008-state-wide-issues/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>CaseyM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billjaquette.net/?p=272#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Forget if you agree with pday loans or not- FOCUS on the fact that the Ohio General Assembly thinks they have the right to control what financial products are available to the citizens of Ohio. Big brother style.

Forget if you have used a PD loan or not-- FOCUS on the fact that other consenting adults do and are capable of making their own decisions, based on their individiual situations. Who are we to say no, you can't use that credit card? Or no you can't use that bank?

Forget everything else -- FOCUS on the fact that eliminating payday loans DOES NOT eliminate the need for short term financial options. I bet 99.9% of the OGA doesn't have to worry about the day to day necessities the rest of are dealing with. They have insurance, pensions, well paying jobs.

Forget about the Pday loan argument -- FOCUS on the controlling and spending of our household money by the state. Considering our current economic situation... I vote for less intrusion!! PLEASE let me manage my own darn $$ since the gov't has shown they are not responsible, accountable or budget conscious. Ohio&#62;&#62; 60M in debt!!

Forget about the Pday loan side-- FOCUS on what else the government is going to decide in the future (under the guise of "paternalism") that we aren't capable of handling as adults. Restricting how much can be spent on food? alcohol? cigarettes? housing? gambling? clothes?

FOCUS on the fact that the OGA is intruding on our personal financial decisions... where does it stop?? Why do they think they know better what will work for us than we do? We live it every day!!!

The Issue of 5 is waaaay bigger than PD Loans &#62;&#62; its about Financial Freedom of Choice, which I consider to be a BASIC FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT!

***NO on ISSUE 5!****</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget if you agree with pday loans or not- FOCUS on the fact that the Ohio General Assembly thinks they have the right to control what financial products are available to the citizens of Ohio. Big brother style.</p>
<p>Forget if you have used a PD loan or not&#8211; FOCUS on the fact that other consenting adults do and are capable of making their own decisions, based on their individiual situations. Who are we to say no, you can&#8217;t use that credit card? Or no you can&#8217;t use that bank?</p>
<p>Forget everything else &#8212; FOCUS on the fact that eliminating payday loans DOES NOT eliminate the need for short term financial options. I bet 99.9% of the OGA doesn&#8217;t have to worry about the day to day necessities the rest of are dealing with. They have insurance, pensions, well paying jobs.</p>
<p>Forget about the Pday loan argument &#8212; FOCUS on the controlling and spending of our household money by the state. Considering our current economic situation&#8230; I vote for less intrusion!! PLEASE let me manage my own darn $$ since the gov&#8217;t has shown they are not responsible, accountable or budget conscious. Ohio&gt;&gt; 60M in debt!!</p>
<p>Forget about the Pday loan side&#8211; FOCUS on what else the government is going to decide in the future (under the guise of &#8220;paternalism&#8221;) that we aren&#8217;t capable of handling as adults. Restricting how much can be spent on food? alcohol? cigarettes? housing? gambling? clothes?</p>
<p>FOCUS on the fact that the OGA is intruding on our personal financial decisions&#8230; where does it stop?? Why do they think they know better what will work for us than we do? We live it every day!!!</p>
<p>The Issue of 5 is waaaay bigger than PD Loans &gt;&gt; its about Financial Freedom of Choice, which I consider to be a BASIC FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT!</p>
<p>***NO on ISSUE 5!****</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ohio 2008 State-wide Issues. by Darren</title>
		<link>http://billjaquette.net/2008/10/27/ohio-2008-state-wide-issues/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billjaquette.net/?p=272#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Issue 5 runs a lot deeper than APR OF A TWO WEEK LOAN..thats right the reason your seeing the big interest rate on a payday loan is because it's only for two weeks.APR SHOULDNT APPLY.Issue 5's yes side wants to put borrowers information in a state controlled data.If you think thats safe,just ask JOE THE PLUMBER thats how people got a hold of his personal information.SO remeber on the 4th ISSUE 5 IS ABOUT A WHOLE LOT MORE THAN APR IT'S ABOUT GOVERNMENT INTRUSION...VOTE NO ON 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Issue 5 runs a lot deeper than APR OF A TWO WEEK LOAN..thats right the reason your seeing the big interest rate on a payday loan is because it&#8217;s only for two weeks.APR SHOULDNT APPLY.Issue 5&#8217;s yes side wants to put borrowers information in a state controlled data.If you think thats safe,just ask JOE THE PLUMBER thats how people got a hold of his personal information.SO remeber on the 4th ISSUE 5 IS ABOUT A WHOLE LOT MORE THAN APR IT&#8217;S ABOUT GOVERNMENT INTRUSION&#8230;VOTE NO ON 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Watch TV Online by Patty</title>
		<link>http://billjaquette.net/2008/08/21/watch-tv-online/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Patty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billjaquette.net/?p=250#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Great site, though if you want to avoid sketchiness, you can find full-length, legal content here: http://tv.blinkx.com/

Can be a lifesaver as well.  Am wondering if Surf will be shut down soon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great site, though if you want to avoid sketchiness, you can find full-length, legal content here: <a href="http://tv.blinkx.com/" rel="nofollow">http://tv.blinkx.com/</a></p>
<p>Can be a lifesaver as well.  Am wondering if Surf will be shut down soon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Car Repairs by FairRepair</title>
		<link>http://billjaquette.net/2008/06/29/car-repairs/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>FairRepair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billjaquette.net/?p=209#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Have a look at http://www.FairRepair.com. Our service will generate an accurate estimate (No ranges) giving you the exact labor time with average labor rates in your area calculated from a 65K record repair facility. Our service also lists out the exact OEM Part # &#38; Price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have a look at <a href="http://www.FairRepair.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.FairRepair.com</a>. Our service will generate an accurate estimate (No ranges) giving you the exact labor time with average labor rates in your area calculated from a 65K record repair facility. Our service also lists out the exact OEM Part # &amp; Price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Global Integrity Report by jessica</title>
		<link>http://billjaquette.net/2008/03/19/global-integrity-report/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billjaquette.net/2008/03/19/global-integrity-report/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>interesting effort, though some country ratings are very puzzling.  worth checking other initiatives as well, see the long article in the Economist last week on Rule of Law (Order in the Jungle) and its measurement, relying on different measures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting effort, though some country ratings are very puzzling.  worth checking other initiatives as well, see the long article in the Economist last week on Rule of Law (Order in the Jungle) and its measurement, relying on different measures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New British UFO Sighting by Drew</title>
		<link>http://billjaquette.net/2008/01/03/new-british-ufo-sighting/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billjaquette.net/2008/01/03/new-british-ufo-sighting/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Hi, 
This is a link to the web site of the guy who took the photo!! http://kelvins-cornwall.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
This is a link to the web site of the guy who took the photo!! <a href="http://kelvins-cornwall.com/" rel="nofollow">http://kelvins-cornwall.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If Seperatist Movements in America had succeeded &#8230;.. by admin</title>
		<link>http://billjaquette.net/2007/11/26/if-seperatist-movements-in-america-had-succeeded/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billjaquette.net/2007/11/26/if-seperatist-movements-in-america-had-succeeded/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>Quoted from a forum discussing this article
Credited to GRX Dragon:

"Interesting, but it fails.

Had Texas not purposely be willing to annexed itself into U.S.A., I'd bet only either Texas or Mexico would be standing-but not both. But most likely it'd be Texas, because either or both the Union or Confederates would aid Texas, seeing as Mexico being a bigger threat. Thus, I think Texas (or Mexico) would own territory of current-day Mexico, Texas, and the entire south-west.

Then... later, Pearl Harbor would never be owned by the Americans. Alaska too. Japan would've been able to touch-down in present-day California with their superior fighting techniques, conquer Texas/Mexico. The Union and Confederates would be like "wtf?" and wonder why Texas/Mexico-the strongest nation they know of-got it's ass kicked. Then, with Japan realizing they have the most profitable mines in the world (Californian gold mines) would use the gold to advance themselves beyond Germany's power. Hitler realizes this, offers Europe a cease-fire (but easy enough to get out of) to get rid of Japan, including Stalin. With Japan ahead of everyone technologically, they eventually launch a few nukes-hitting Germany, England, and Russia.

So everyone calls on a cease-fire after the aftermath, Japan owning most of Asia and North America reluctantly agree. Afterwards, England takes this as a chance to try to take back the colonies in North America. Their reason for it? "We need to grow stronger to stop Japan from further attacks."

But the Union and Confederates have a different idea. They ally themselves then accept refugees from the Mexican/Texan lands, so long as the refugees that're able to fight are willing to fight. Canada still under control of the queen does nothing. Eventually, an uprising occurs. The Union/Confederate alliance makes war with Japan, using guerilla tactics to clean them out of the main-lands. Europe takes this as a chance to fight back against Japan again, since they'll be fighting on all sides. Japan's strength diminishes, but with their last breath they go suicidal, detonating their final nuclear bomb in their home land. Russia and Germany go to war afterwards, becoming similar to the cold war of our time. England decides to invade America, wanting their colonies back.


At least that's my general idea."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quoted from a forum discussing this article<br />
Credited to GRX Dragon:</p>
<p>&#8220;Interesting, but it fails.</p>
<p>Had Texas not purposely be willing to annexed itself into U.S.A., I&#8217;d bet only either Texas or Mexico would be standing-but not both. But most likely it&#8217;d be Texas, because either or both the Union or Confederates would aid Texas, seeing as Mexico being a bigger threat. Thus, I think Texas (or Mexico) would own territory of current-day Mexico, Texas, and the entire south-west.</p>
<p>Then&#8230; later, Pearl Harbor would never be owned by the Americans. Alaska too. Japan would&#8217;ve been able to touch-down in present-day California with their superior fighting techniques, conquer Texas/Mexico. The Union and Confederates would be like &#8220;wtf?&#8221; and wonder why Texas/Mexico-the strongest nation they know of-got it&#8217;s ass kicked. Then, with Japan realizing they have the most profitable mines in the world (Californian gold mines) would use the gold to advance themselves beyond Germany&#8217;s power. Hitler realizes this, offers Europe a cease-fire (but easy enough to get out of) to get rid of Japan, including Stalin. With Japan ahead of everyone technologically, they eventually launch a few nukes-hitting Germany, England, and Russia.</p>
<p>So everyone calls on a cease-fire after the aftermath, Japan owning most of Asia and North America reluctantly agree. Afterwards, England takes this as a chance to try to take back the colonies in North America. Their reason for it? &#8220;We need to grow stronger to stop Japan from further attacks.&#8221;</p>
<p>But the Union and Confederates have a different idea. They ally themselves then accept refugees from the Mexican/Texan lands, so long as the refugees that&#8217;re able to fight are willing to fight. Canada still under control of the queen does nothing. Eventually, an uprising occurs. The Union/Confederate alliance makes war with Japan, using guerilla tactics to clean them out of the main-lands. Europe takes this as a chance to fight back against Japan again, since they&#8217;ll be fighting on all sides. Japan&#8217;s strength diminishes, but with their last breath they go suicidal, detonating their final nuclear bomb in their home land. Russia and Germany go to war afterwards, becoming similar to the cold war of our time. England decides to invade America, wanting their colonies back.</p>
<p>At least that&#8217;s my general idea.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Politics Test by MajinAlchemist</title>
		<link>http://billjaquette.net/2007/11/16/the-politics-test/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>MajinAlchemist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billjaquette.net/2007/11/16/the-politics-test/#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Your true political self:
You are a

Social Liberal
(65% permissive)

and an...

Economic Liberal
(20% permissive)

You are best described as a:

Strong Democrat (20e/65s)


You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe in economic fairness. loc: (56, -113)
modscore: (12, 39)
raw: (1636)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your true political self:<br />
You are a</p>
<p>Social Liberal<br />
(65% permissive)</p>
<p>and an&#8230;</p>
<p>Economic Liberal<br />
(20% permissive)</p>
<p>You are best described as a:</p>
<p>Strong Democrat (20e/65s)</p>
<p>You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe in economic fairness. loc: (56, -113)<br />
modscore: (12, 39)<br />
raw: (1636)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Page Updates by admin</title>
		<link>http://billjaquette.net/2007/11/05/page-updates/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 05:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billjaquette.net/2007/11/05/page-updates/#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Testing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Testing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10 Easy Arithmetic Tricks by sue</title>
		<link>http://billjaquette.net/2007/10/01/10-easy-arithmetic-tricks/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 01:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://billjaquette.net/2007/10/01/10-easy-arithmetic-tricks/#comment-150</guid>
		<description>And math teachers don't tell us this why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And math teachers don&#8217;t tell us this why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
