Jon Stewart teaches a history lesson on oil dependence

How sad it is that we still have this problem.

President Obama called for "America to seize its own destiny" and stop depending on foreign oil in his Oval Office speech Tuesday. But Obama is just the latest in a long line of presidents who have tried to get the U.S. off of oil and failed.

Comedy Central's Jon Stewart presented a little history lesson Wednesday to remind his viewers just how hard it is to beat the oil addiction.

Unlike many of his predecessors, Obama is one of the few presidents who has been willing say that oil is a finite resource.

"For decades we have known the days of cheap and easily accessible oil were numbered. Now is the moment for this generation to embark on a national mission to unleash America's innovation and seize control of our own destiny," Obama said in his Tuesday speech.

But the call to end the country's dependence on oil isn't a new one. In his 2006 State of the Union address, President George W. Bush said, "This country can dramatically improve our environment, move beyond a petroleum based economy and make our dependence on Middle Eastern oil a thing of the past."

"But back then in 2006 we didn't do it because oil dependence had at that point only entangled us in two simultaneous wars," Stewart noted. "But now it's gotten us into two wars and a giant spill. That's the push we needed," he said sarcastically.

"I wish we had taken care of this energy problem ten years ago when there was no war and the economy was great. That would have been a great time to develop a long-term energy strategy," said Stewart.

At the time, President Bill Clinton did have a similar idea. "We need a long-term energy strategy to maximize conservation and the maximize the development of alternative sources of energy," Clinton said in 2000.

"And we would have done it too if he hadn't gotten distracted by that other spill," Stewart joked.

Perhaps Clinton was just echoing his predecessor. In 1988, President George H.W. Bush said, "There is no security for the United states in further dependence on foreign oil."

"I bet the four guys before him would have gotten us off of foreign oil too if they had thought of it," Stewart continued.

But they did.

In 1981, President Ronald Reagan told a joint session of Congress, "We will continue supportive research leading to the development of new technologies and more independence of foreign oil."

In a 1979 speech, President Jimmy Carter appeared outraged at the "intolerable dependence on foreign oil."

President Gerald Ford touted "standby emergency programs to achieve the independence we want" in 1975.

"We'll break the back of the energy crisis. We will lay the foundation for our future capacity to meet America's energy needs from America's own resources," President Richard Nixon said in his 1974 State of the Union address.

Stewart was nearly speechless failure of the last eight presidents. "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me eight times, am I a f**king idiot?" he wondered.

 Jon Stewart teaches a history lesson on oil dependence

Go to Source

Popularity: 1% [?]

Jobs on iPhone 4 antenna: “avoid holding it in this way”

Steve Jobs has made a horrible PR blunder with the new iPhone 4. People have reported dropped calls and horrible signal when holding it with their left hand. His response? "All phones have sensitive areas," Jobs wrote. "Just avoid holding it in this way." Ars Technica has more below. Follow the link to their article.
"All phones have sensitive areas," Jobs wrote. "Just avoid holding it in this way." TUAW reader Craig Brockman was able to get a more detailed response, which Engadget reports is Apple's official statement on the issue: "Gripping any phone will result in some attenuation of its antenna performance, with certain places being worse than others depending on the placement of the antennas. This is a fact of life for every wireless phone," Jobs wrote. "If you ever experience this on your iPhone 4, avoid gripping it in the lower left corner in a way that covers both sides of the black strip in the metal band, or simply use one of many available cases." So, it appears that our worry that Apple's iPhone 4 bumpers would be a recommended fix was founded after all. What Jobs and Apple are saying about all phones being affected by this issue is true to some degree. Your hand can attenuate the signal to any radio antenna—try playing with the antenna of a portable AM/FM radio, for instance. Spencer Webb, an antenna engineer with Antennasys Inc, explained in a blog post that the placement of antennas in mobile devices is predicated partly on FCC and carrier testing requirements, so Apple's design isn't entirely out of the ordinary. Issues of signal degradation similar to that of the iPhone 4 have also been reported with the iPhone 3G and 3GS, as well as Google's Nexus 1. One inconsistency is that numerous examples of using the iPhone 4, including Jobs' own WWDC demo, have shown users gripping the iPhone 4 in the exact manner that triggers the issue. Macintouch reader Saam G said that Apple Support confirmed the issue, blaming "a missing protective coating on some of the parts," so there may be more to this issue than what Jobs is admitting. Read the comments on this post  Jobs on iPhone 4 antenna: “avoid holding it in this way”
Go to Source

Popularity: 1% [?]

Tw2Buzz - Import Your Twitter Contacts Into Google Buzz

Tw2Buzz.com is a service that will allow you to import your Twitter follows to Google Buzz for easier, more all in 1 following.  They're also in the process of creating a fb2buzz (Facebook) and ff2buzz (friendfeed).  If you prefer Google Buzz over these other services, or just want to condense them all into 1 central Google Buzz place, these services are for you. Currently though, they are in a closed beta and require an invite key.  I currently have 3 left, so if you're interested leave a comment and I'll send one your way.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Government Types - The Cow Version

FEUDALISM: You have two cows. Your lord takes some of the milk. PURE SOCIALISM: You have two cows. The government takes them and puts them in a barn with everyone else's cows. You have to take care of all of the cows. The government gives you as much milk as you need. BUREAUCRATIC SOCIALISM: You have two cows. The government takes them and put them in a barn with everyone else's cows. They are cared for by ex-chicken farmers. You have to take care of the chickens the government took from the chicken farmers. The government gives you as much milk and eggs as the regulations say you need. FASCISM: You have two cows. The government takes both, hires you to take care of them and sells you the milk. PURE COMMUNISM: You have two cows. Your neighbors help you take care of them, and you all share the milk. RUSSIAN COMMUNISM: You have two cows. You have to take care of them, but the government takes all the milk. CAMBODIAN COMMUNISM: You have two cows. The government takes both of them and shoots you. DICTATORSHIP: You have two cows. The government takes both and drafts you. PURE DEMOCRACY: You have two cows. Your neighbors decide who gets the milk. REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY: You have two cows. Your neighbors pick someone to tell you who gets the milk. BUREAUCRACY: You have two cows. At first the government regulates what you can feed them and when you can milk them. Then it pays you not to milk them. Then it takes both, shoots one, milks the other and pours the milk down the drain. Then it requires you to fill out forms accounting for the missing cows. PURE ANARCHY: You have two cows. Either you sell the milk at a fair price or your neighbors try to take the cows and kill you. LIBERTARIAN/ANARCHO-CAPITALISM: You have two cows. You sell one and buy a bull. SURREALISM: You have two giraffes. The government requires you to take harmonica lessons.

Popularity: 2% [?]