Popularity: 1% [?]
Tag Archives: Constitution
Rachel Maddow Takes On Pat Buchanan (VIDEO): "You're Playing With Fire... You're Living In The 1950s"
Maddow asked Pat Buchanan why he thought that 108 of the 110 Supreme Court Justices had been white. He replied:
via Rachel Maddow Takes On Pat Buchanan (VIDEO): "You're Playing With Fire... You're Living In The 1950s"."White men were 100% of the people that wrote the Constitution, 100% of the people that signed the Declaration of Independence, 100% of the people who died at Gettysburg and Vicksburg, probably close to 100% of the people who died at Normandy. This has been a country built basically by white folks, who were 90% of the nation in 1960 when I was growing up and the other 10% were African-Americans who had been discriminated against. That's why.
Popularity: 1% [?]
Ohio 2008 State-wide Issues.
Popularity: 1% [?]
Is The President Above The Law?
In the United States we believe in the "Rule of Law". A term meaning that everyone must obey the law, and nobody is above the law. These laws are to be written, public, and challengable in court.
Bush's nomination for Attorney General thinks one man is above this.
AT his confirmation hearings last week, Michael B. Mukasey, President Bush’s nominee for attorney general, was asked whether the president is required to obey federal statutes. Judge Mukasey replied, "That would have to depend on whether what goes outside the statute nonetheless lies within the authority of the president to defend the country."
According to Judge Mukasey’s statement, as well as other parts of his testimony, the president’s authority "to defend the nation" trumps his obligation to obey the law. Take the federal statute governing military commissions in Guantánamo Bay. No one, including the president’s lawyers, argues that this statute is unconstitutional. The only question is whether the president is required to obey it even if in his judgment the statute is not the best way "to defend the nation."
If he is not, we no longer live under the government the founders established.
His arguement basically comes down to the fact that The Constitution is above all laws, and that since the President is required "the defense of the nation" in the Constitution, laws are null and void in pursuit of this goal.
This is NOT a view the nation should embrace. The defense of the nation can and should be pursued following the Constitution, International Law, and also following our domestic laws. Violating these ideals has led other nations to dictatorship, corruption, and loss of liberty. It CAN happen here as well, not just other nations.
The Attorney General is THE law enforcement official in the country. It's their job to ENFORCE the laws of the land, not make exceptions to them. If something is illegal, the Attorney General should be the first one to stop the President and his actions. That was the main problem with the last one. Gonzales was seen as just defining things and changing them to fit the current Administration. Not holding the Administration to the law.
Popularity: 1% [?]
Constitution 101, the difference between RIGHTS and PRIVILEGES
A detailed 8 part lecture about the Most important document in the history of the United States of America and how the government today continues to overstep the boundaries set in place by the Constitution. Explains the differences between RIGHTS and PRIVILEGES and the governments relationship to protecting those RIGHTS. A video breakdown of the Constitution, rights, privileges, etc.What U.S. Citizens SHOULD know about their own country and government, but many don't. Yes it takes time, but it's sad the misunderstanding people have about their rights. Watch and Educate yourself
Popularity: 1% [?]