The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us

This lively RSA Animate, adapted from Dan Pink's talk at the RSA, illustrates the hidden truths behind what really motivates us at home and in the workplace. www.theRSA.org
Surprisingly, money is actually a very limited motivator for humans. A new way to look at how the  government and companies can motivate their citizens and employees for better results.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Government Types - The Cow Version

FEUDALISM: You have two cows. Your lord takes some of the milk. PURE SOCIALISM: You have two cows. The government takes them and puts them in a barn with everyone else's cows. You have to take care of all of the cows. The government gives you as much milk as you need. BUREAUCRATIC SOCIALISM: You have two cows. The government takes them and put them in a barn with everyone else's cows. They are cared for by ex-chicken farmers. You have to take care of the chickens the government took from the chicken farmers. The government gives you as much milk and eggs as the regulations say you need. FASCISM: You have two cows. The government takes both, hires you to take care of them and sells you the milk. PURE COMMUNISM: You have two cows. Your neighbors help you take care of them, and you all share the milk. RUSSIAN COMMUNISM: You have two cows. You have to take care of them, but the government takes all the milk. CAMBODIAN COMMUNISM: You have two cows. The government takes both of them and shoots you. DICTATORSHIP: You have two cows. The government takes both and drafts you. PURE DEMOCRACY: You have two cows. Your neighbors decide who gets the milk. REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY: You have two cows. Your neighbors pick someone to tell you who gets the milk. BUREAUCRACY: You have two cows. At first the government regulates what you can feed them and when you can milk them. Then it pays you not to milk them. Then it takes both, shoots one, milks the other and pours the milk down the drain. Then it requires you to fill out forms accounting for the missing cows. PURE ANARCHY: You have two cows. Either you sell the milk at a fair price or your neighbors try to take the cows and kill you. LIBERTARIAN/ANARCHO-CAPITALISM: You have two cows. You sell one and buy a bull. SURREALISM: You have two giraffes. The government requires you to take harmonica lessons.

Popularity: 3% [?]

Fourteen Defining Characteristics Of Fascism

Political scientist Dr. Lawrence Britt recently wrote an article about fascism ("Fascism Anyone?," Free Inquiry, Spring 2003, page 20). Studying the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia), and Pinochet (Chile), Dr. Britt found they all had 14 elements in common. He calls these the identifying characteristics of fascism. The excerpt is in accordance with the magazine's policy.
1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism - Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays. 2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights - Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc. 3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause - The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc. 4. Supremacy of the Military - Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized. 5. Rampant Sexism - The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homosexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution. 6. Controlled Mass Media - Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common. 7. Obsession with National Security - Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses. 8. Religion and Government are Intertwined - Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions. 9. Corporate Power is Protected - The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite. 10. Labor Power is Suppressed - Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed. 11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts - Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked. 12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment - Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations. 13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption - Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders. 14. Fraudulent Elections - Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections. Copyright © 2003 Free Inquiry magazine

Popularity: 1% [?]

Too Big to Fail - Now Even Bigger

26e2e275f14efb221275216f4f586114 Too Big to Fail   Now Even Bigger

During the Bank Crisis last year was occuring a phrase often heard was "too big to fail".  Meaning a bank was too big to let fail and that it would have a ripple effect in the economy if we let it.  As the pie-chart above show, unfortunately the crisis made it worse.  There are less banks, and the banks that are left are even bigger.  What happens now if one of them or many of them are about to fail?  Now it's even harder to let them fail. This is bad.  Capitalism is balanced by risk.  Businesses need to evaluate risk and balance them with possible positives.  Unfortunately, with banks as large as they are now, the risk to them is even less.  Why?  Because if they take on too much risk and run into trouble, it's hard for the government to let them go for fear of damage to the rest of the economy. Without that fear of failure, the banks can take on even riskier prospects and increase their chances of running into problems without severe consequences. Whether or not they consciously think about it or not, in the back of their minds now is the thought that if they run into too much trouble, the government will probably ride in and save them.  Large benefit, low risk. In terms of consumers and customers, they will also see these banks as a safer place to do business and put their money, because they perceive them as having their backs covered by the government, thus making them larger and hurting their competition. I'm not saying none of the banks should have been bailed out, the threat to the economy overall was great, but something now needs to be done about this. This is not capitalism, this is dangerous.  Risk needs to be assigned back to the banks, and competition between all banks needs to occur. The Big 4's marketshare is too big, even for their own good. Too Bigger to Fail Part 1

Popularity: 1% [?]

United in Hatred

Glenn Beck's stated goal for his 9.12 project is very noble and respectable.  To return to the bi-partisan time of the day after 9/11, when Americans no matter their race, political orientation, or gender united and worked together. Unfortunately, that's nothing like what it's become. The 9.12 rally in Washington, DC was shameful, embarrassing, and overall political.  The hatred and misinformation on the signs was astounding. The racism and extremism even more-so.  Instead of uniting the country, it has further divided it between  those who support Obama, those who disagree with Obama but are able to be civil and free-thinking, and paranoia extremists who will believe anything anti-Obama no matter the evidence to the contrary.  The protesters were instead united in hatred of the government and Obama, even if they couldn't agree on the exact reasons. The hate was bad itself, but it also contained veiled implied threats of violence. One such sign said "We came unarmed (this time)." They claim to be protesting for "Americans", while ignoring the most American point, this is an elected government. The people HAVE spoken and chosen these people to be the government. Just because they were their choice does not make them any less representative of the people. A common phrase during the Bush Administration was "Love it or leave it" whenever an anti-Bush administration protest showed up. Now these same people are protesting Obama and threatening a coup because they don't like the guy the rest of the country chose? This doesn't sound very "American" to me. Also, contrary to some claims, the 50 - 60,000 people at the rallys were NOT larger than the few MILLION people at Obama's inauguration. Pictures: More Photos

Popularity: 1% [?]