Popularity: 1% [?]
Tag Archives: Law
Crazy Birther Claim #2
Ok, so the birthers not only claim Obama was born in Kenya and not Hawaii, but they have an argument for even if he was born in the US.
His father, who did not live in the United States for more than a couple of years, was a subject/citizen of Kenya/Great Britain at the time of Barack’s birth and afterwards, AND further, as Barack himself admitted on his website during the 2008 campaign, Barack was therefore born SUBJECT TO THE GOVERNANCE OF GREAT BRITAIN.
The FACT that he was not born of TWO US CITIZEN PARENTS is all that matters. The question of his birth certificate is a distraction (a distraction fostered by Obama’s supporters?) that ought not to occupy our time and resources.
Except this is not so, and has already been debunked before.
Not only does it make no sense (if Britain changed the law so that anyone born in America was also a British Citizen, would no one be able to become President? It's our laws that matter, not theirs.), but Obama is not even the only/first President to only have 1 American parent. There have been 7, that's SEVEN, Presidents of the United States with 1 parent a US Citizen and the other a foreigner.
Andrew Jackson
James Buchanan
Chester A. Arthur
Woodrow Wilson
Herbert Hoover
Barack Obama
I'm sorry some people not only don't understand the law, but also can't do a little research.
Popularity: 1% [?]
Laws Regarding Recording A Phone Conversation
Popularity: 1% [?]
For those keeping score: Number of arrests in Michael Phelps case: 8. Number of arrests in peanut company salmonella case: 0
Popularity: 1% [?]
EPA DENIES Environmental Enforcement Law
“The Bush administration is moving forward with a clear national solution – not a confusing patchwork of state rules,” Johnson said in a conference call with reporters. “I believe this is a better approach.”LINK California's law would not have conflicted in any way with the Federal law. There was no real reason to override California in this. After that report, it has also come out that this decision was made AGAINST the advice of the EPA Administrator's own staff.
"California met every criteria . . . on the merits. The same criteria we have used for the last 40 years on all the other waivers," said an EPA staffer. "We told him that. All the briefings we have given him laid out the facts." EPA administrator Stephen L. Johnson announced Wednesday that because President Bush had signed an energy bill raising average fuel economy that there was no need or justification for separate state regulation. He also said that California's request did not meet the legal standard set out in the Clean Air Act. But his staff, which had worked for months on the waiver decision, concluded just the opposite, the sources said Thursday. The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk with the media or because they feared reprisals. California Air Resources Board Chairwoman Mary Nichols said she was also told by EPA staff that they were overruled by Johnson. She said Johnson's decision showed "that this administration ignores the science and ignores the law to reach the politically convenient conclusion." Nichols, who served as assistant EPA administrator overseeing air regulations under President Clinton, said she had helped write waiver decisions there, and "I know California met all the criteria on this one."LINK Due to the conflicts arising from this decision, and the way it was carried out, the House Oversight Committee is now investigating the whole incident. LINK California is also suing the Federal Government and the EPA in particular to have this decision overturned. From the article:
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - California sued the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday for denying its first-in-the-nation greenhouse gas limits on cars, trucks and SUVs, challenging the Bush administration's conclusion that states have no business setting emission standards. Other states are expected to join the lawsuit[...] "There's absolutely no justification for the administrator's action," Attorney General Jerry Brown said Wednesday. "It's illegal. It's unconscionable and a gross dereliction of duty."LINK This is not over and there is every indication California will win the lawsuit and somebody is going to be very embarrassed by the end of this.
Popularity: 1% [?]