Shared From Google Reader For May 10, 2011

Controversy over 'baby safes' where parents can abandon unwanted babies

Posted: 10 May 2011 08:13 AM PDT

Kim Highfield, director of Out of Africa Children's Fund, opens the "baby safe" at the Anybody Family Centre on May 9 in Cape Town, South Africa. An alarm goes off when an unwanted baby is placed in the safe, which then automatically locks.

pb 110510 babysafe da.photoblog900 300x194 Shared From Google Reader For May 10, 2011

South Africa's Times newspaper reported today on a controversial new scheme in Cape Town that allows parents to leave unwanted babies anonymously in a "baby safe" mounted on an exterior wall of a community center.

The initiative was launched last week by charity worker Kim Highfield. "Less than 10 seconds after a baby is placed in the metal structure, which is lined with a baby blanket and pillow, an alarm is triggered inside the building", the Times reported.

"Child welfare experts agree that, though Highfield means well, her initiative could increase baby abandonment and create a myriad of legal and social problems."

Nobody has yet made use of the safe, but the newspaper reports that about 101 babies have been deposited in a similar facility in Johannesburg since January 2007.

U.S. Was Braced for Fight With Pakistanis in Bin Laden Raid

Posted: 10 May 2011 09:10 AM PDT

President Obama insisted that the force hunting down Osama bin Laden last week be large enough to fight its way out of Pakistan if confronted by local forces.

More Than Half Of Students Tested Don't Know The Purpose Of The Bill of Rights

Posted: 10 May 2011 07:00 AM PDT

Fewer than half of American eighth graders knew the purpose of the Bill of Rights on the most recent national civics examination, and only one in 10 demonstrated acceptable knowledge of the checks and balances among the legislative, executive and judicial branches, according to test results released on Wednesday.

At the same time, three-quarters of high school seniors who took the test, the National Assessment of Educational Progress, were unable to demonstrate skills like identifying the effect of United States foreign policy on other nations or naming a power granted to Congress by the Constitution.

“Today’s NAEP results confirm that we have a crisis on our hands when it comes to civics education,” said Sandra Day O’Connor, the former Supreme Court justice, who last year founded icivics.org, a nonprofit group that teaches students civics through Web-based games and other tools.

The Department of Education administered the test, known as the nation’s report card, to 27,000 4th-, 8th- and 12th-grade students last year. Questions covered themes like how government is financed, what rights are protected by the Constitution and how laws are passed.

Peg lamp lets us spend less time screwing in light bulbs, more time talking about them (video)

Posted: 09 May 2011 01:29 PM PDT

We know what you're thinking, but the Jolly Green Giant didn't drop something on the way to hang out his laundry. Designed by Steffi Min for her industrial design senior thesis, the Peg lamp looks and functions like an over-sized clothespin, directly clipping onto a standard light bulb. As you can see in the video after the break, changing a bulb takes only a second or two, and there's almost no risk of broken glass. We don't expect a clothes pin connector to appear as a retail product anytime soon, but if we can build our own humanoid robots, we can probably find a way to slide an over-sized rubber band around two wedges of wood.

Continue reading Peg lamp lets us spend less time screwing in light bulbs, more time talking about them (video)

Popularity: 1% [?]

Keep Up With the Supreme Court With SCOTUSBlog

Much attention is focused in the news every day on Congress and especially on the President of the United States.  Many news networks often seem to forget the third, yet equally important branch of the United States, the Supreme Court.  SCOTUSBlog is a blog dedicated to covering the daily happenings in the Supreme Court, both in legal terms and everyday terms.  For people interested in the law, politics, their rights, or how the government works it is a very useful and informative site.  Also very useful for research into cases and proceedings. SCOTUSBlog Also provided is a wiki about cases and statistics. SCOTUSWiki
 Keep Up With the Supreme Court With SCOTUSBlog

Popularity: 1% [?]

NOT in the Constitution. A Refresher.

In the past year, many people seem to attribute their beliefs or common phrases to the Constitution that don't exist.  If you've heard one that isn't listed here, leave me a comment and let me know. 'We hold these truths to be self evident ...": In the Declaration of Independence, but not the Constitution. "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,": Also Declaration of Independence, not Constitution. Separation of Church and State: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion"    From this sprung the debate of separation of church and state.  The line originally simply meant the Government could not found, create, or adopt a national religion.  It does NOT state that the government must have absolutely nothing to do with religion what-so-ever.  More anti-religious citizens have pushed it further and further attempting to create a wall between the two, but it is not in the Constitution that way. Innocent until Proven Guilty: American courts treat accused criminals as innocent until proven guilty; this ensures that they are accorded all the rights they are due. There is nothing in the Constitution about a right to be treated innocent until proven guilty, though. The concept came about as a combination of trial rights that ARE in the Constitution, as well as other widely accepted legal practices. The Right to a Fair Trial: There is nothing in the Constitution about a “right to a fair trial.” The Constitution lists several trial-related rights, such as the right to a jury trial and that a trial should be held where the crime occurred; yet if the state could give you a trial that is unfair without violating those explicit rights, then the letter of the Constitution would not be violated. Once again, this concept is accepted as natural from the rights and legal precedents already accepted. Right to a Jury of Your Peers: Also not listed in the Constitution, this practice is held over from English custom where nobles would be tried by other nobles and peasants by other peasants. The Right to Vote: The Constitution lists how you can not be allowed to vote, but not how you ARE allowed to vote.  Beyond what's spelled out by the Constitution and Federal law, states can create any criteria to vote they want. The Right to Travel: Several Supreme Court cases have ruled that this basic right exists and that the state can’t interfere with travel, but it is not in the Constitution. Judicial Review: The idea that the courts have the authority to review the constitutionality of laws passed by legislatures is firmly entrenched in American law and politics. However, the Constitution does not mention “Judicial Review” and does not explicitly establish the concept. The idea that the judicial branch could be any kind of check on the power of the other two branches is baseless without this power, though, which is why Marbury v. Madison (1803) established it. Or were these just activist judges? The Right to Marriage: Marriage is a carry-over from religion, taxation, and inter-racial coupling laws, but has no basis in the Constitution.  The proposed Amendment to add the "Marriage Protection" clause would have created its only mention if it had passed. The Right to Procreate: While some believe this to be a basic human right, there is nothing in the Constitution about it. The Right to Privacy: This one is debatable. While not stated in the Constitution, several passages imply such a right and many court decisions have found a right to privacy in different aspects of human life, such as contraception the education of children. Critics complain that courts have invented this right for political purposes.

Popularity: 1% [?]